Pete WHAT are you disagreeing with or are you just venting?
ARE there cases where the annex exceeds it intent - sure but do you mean the annex is not suppose to be informational and that one can enforce a requirement in the body after educating themselves using the annex. I don’t think you’ve attempted to work new material into the body by first submitting it to the annex or is that it. I’ll be watching you at the next committee meeting - lol. Roland Roland Huggins, PE - VP Engineering American Fire Sprinkler Assn. --- Fire Sprinklers Saves Lives Dallas, TX http://www.firesprinkler.org <http://www.firesprinkler.org/> > On Nov 4, 2015, at 8:14 AM, Pete Schwab <[email protected]> wrote: > > Roland > I would disagree. Example.... Vents > Pete > > Peter Schwab > VP of Purchasing and Engineering technologies _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
