Risk Category determination out of ASCE-07 (2010) Table 1.5-1 drives the 
Seismic Design Category (SDC) based on Ss and S1 to a more severe designation 
in Tables 11.6-1 and 11.6-2.  As Craig said, SDC should be provided for 
sprinkler contractors where this 'severity' has already been determined 
(seismic protection required...or not); as well as Ss (short-period spectral 
response parameter) which is used to design for the seismic bracing horizontal 
load determination using NFPA 13 (2017) Section 9.3.5.9 where bracing is 
required.  The risk categorization of a building or structure as Category IV 
simply makes it more likely that it will require seismic protection.

Ryan L. Hinson, PE*, SET**  \  Burns & McDonnell
Senior Fire Protection Engineer
O 952-656-3662 \  M 320-250-5404  \  F 952-229-2923
[email protected]  \  burnsmcd.com<http://www.burnsmcd.com/>
8201 Norman Center Drive, Suite 300  \  Bloomington, MN 55437
*Registered in: MN, PA, & TX
**NICET IV - Water-Based Systems Layout

From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2016 10:41 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Seismic Requirements for Risk Category IV (Essential Facility)

Risk Factor doesn't mean anything special to the sprinkler contractor.  You 
need to know Seismic Design Category, not Site Class or Risk Factor.

Risk Factor is an input to the structural engineer along with other factors 
used to define the Seismic Design Category.

ASCE 07 indicates what is required to be braced based on Seismic Design 
Category.

You should contact the local building code authority to determine if there are 
any special requirements for Risk Factor IV if you can't get answers from the 
EOR.



Craig L. Prahl
Fire Protection Group Lead/SME
CH2M
200 Verdae Blvd.
Greenville, SC  29607
Direct - 864.920.7540
Fax - 864.920.7129
CH2MHILL Extension  77540
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>


From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Jerry Van Kolken
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2016 11:34 AM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Seismic Requirements for Risk Category IV (Essential Facility) 
[EXTERNAL]

The site is Class C,

This project is in So. California, EQ bracing is always required. I just wanted 
to know is there is anything special about Risk Category IV.

Jerry Van Kolken
Millennium Fire Protection
(760) 722-2722

From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2016 2:16 PM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Seismic Requirements for Risk Category IV (Essential Facility)

What's the Seismic Design Category assigned by the Structural engineer for the 
project?  A,B,C,D,E?

The Fire Protection Engineer should have clarified whether or not EQ bracing 
was required based on the above category which was determined by the structural 
EOR if it was done right or done at all.


Craig L. Prahl
Fire Protection Group Lead/SME
CH2M
200 Verdae Blvd.
Greenville, SC  29607
Direct - 864.920.7540
Fax - 864.920.7129
CH2MHILL Extension  77540
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Jerry Van Kolken
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2016 5:06 PM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Seismic Requirements for Risk Category IV (Essential Facility) 
[EXTERNAL]

I have a building being classified as an essential facility. I'm told that the 
building must be operation after an earthquake, whether or not that includes 
the sprinkler system,  I will need to get RFI'd. But my question is would there 
be any special requirements for the hanging and bracing of the sprinkler system 
due this classification?

Jerry Van Kolken
Millennium Fire Protection Corp.
2950 San Luis Rey Rd.
Oceanside, CA 92058
(760) 722-2722 FX 722-2730

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to