Of course!
I know this is unorthodox thinking, especially for an NFPA 14 maestro.
But I figured out quite a few years ago how to get not only K, but the Q
and P that goes with it for a flowing outlet with only two pieces of
information; the nominal diameter and the coefficient of discharge.
And after the twists and turns and showing off and stepping in it this
weekend I wanted to take my best shot at being the anybody with a decent K
for a 2.5 inch hose valve, as Vince asked.
So "In the same way as a nominal 1/2" sprinkler..."
K=113.85, if the C of D is .61,
final answer.

Thanks for hollering back, I was getting lonely out here,

Brad
On Feb 19, 2017 11:13 AM, "Steve Leyton" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Of course, that should have been GPM and not PSI.
>
>
> Steve
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Steve Leyton <[email protected]>
> Date: 2/19/17 8:44 AM (GMT-08:00)
> To: [email protected], Vince Sabolik <[email protected]>
>
> Subject: RE: K for a  Hose Valve
>
> Awesome. So the "nominal" flow at 100 PSI will be 1,138.5 PSI?
>
> Maybe we need to change the hydraulic design method in the standard.
>
> Steve L.
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Brad Casterline <[email protected]>
> Date: 2/19/17 2:09 AM (GMT-08:00)
> To: Vince Sabolik <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> Subject: Re: K for a 2½" Hose Valve
>
> K=113.85
>
> In the same way that a nominal 1/2" sprinkler with a Coefficient of
> Discharge of .75 has a K=5.6, a nominal 2.5" hose valve with a Coefficient
> of Discharge of .61 has a K=113.85.
>
> Brad
> On Feb 17, 2017 8:28 AM, "Vince Sabolik" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Good morning, everyone...
>>
>> Does anybody have a decent K Factor for a 2½" hose valve?
>>
>> Thanks!      Vince
>>
>> 11351 Pearl Road /  Suite 101
>> Strongsville, Ohio 44136
>> Phone 440 238-4800 <(440)%20238-4800> Fax 440 238-4876 <(440)%20238-4876> 
>> Cell
>> 440 724-7601 <(440)%20724-7601>
>>
>>
>> * Vince Sabolik *
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-
>> firesprinkler.org
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.
> org
>
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to