Whether in #13 or the IFC, the specific always takes precedence to the general.

Best.

Bruce Verhei 

> On Jan 25, 2018, at 11:45, Matt Grise <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I agree with craig - group A plastic or not... there is specific guidance for 
> tires for a reason. It is similar to the difference between a Class 3 
> commodity and Idle Pallet Storage or Expanded/Unexpanded plastics... Pile 
> storage vs rack storage. Fire testing has shown that the product form and 
> storage arrangement is very important. Just because it is a certain material 
> does not mean it will burn the same way. 
> 
> Matt 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] 
> On Behalf Of [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 1:38 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Rubber Tire Storage
> 
> Tires are hard to get lit and therefore hard to put out once you do (thermal 
> inertia).
> Maybe the reason for the separate standard, more than the material 
> composition, is the expected fire growth/decline rate, decline whether 
> sprinklered or not.
> I read somewhere years ago with a tire storage fire it might reach a point 
> where the best thing to do would be hop on a fork truck and haul them out to 
> the yard and let them go for a day or two!
> 
> Brad
> 
> Quoting "Prahl, Craig/GVL" <[email protected]>:
> 
>> If you were dealing with purely synthetic rubber in slabs that would 
>> be a whole different story.  But a slab of rubber is different than a 
>> tire.
>> 
>> 
>> Craig L. Prahl
>> Fire Protection Group Lead/SME
>> JACOBS - CH2M
>> 200 Verdae Blvd.
>> Greenville, SC  29607
>> Direct - 864.920.7540
>> Fax - 864.920.7129
>> CH2MHILL Extension  77540
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> 
>> From: Sprinklerforum  
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of  
>> John Paulsen
>> Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 1:30 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: RE: Rubber Tire Storage [EXTERNAL]
>> 
>> James:
>> 
>> He doesn't think NFPA-13, Chapter 18 applies? I understand his  
>> confusion, the commodities definitions do reference synthetic rubber  
>> as a Group A Plastic, but it doesn't specifically reference tires in  
>> the definitions....
>> 
>> John Paulsen - SET
>> Crown Fire System Design
>> 6282 Seeds Rd.
>> Grove City, OH 43123
>> P - 614-782-2438
>> F - 614-782-2374
>> C - 614-348-8206
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: Sprinklerforum  
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of  
>> James Crawford
>> Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 12:56 PM
>> To:  
>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>> Subject: Rubber Tire Storage
>> 
>> NFPA #13 (2013) is my reference.
>> 
>> I have an AHJ that is telling me that Rubber Tires are classified as  
>> a Group "A" plastic for the purpose of commodity classifications.
>> 
>> I have informed him that Rubber Tires are a commodity classification  
>> on their own, but he disagrees, he says there are a synthetic rubber  
>> so are a Group "A" plastic.
>> 
>> I have shown him the Table A5.6.3 for Commodity classifications in  
>> NFPA #13 where rubber tires are not mentioned and chapter 18 that  
>> deals with Rubber Tire storage but he still disagrees.
>> 
>> Any suggestions?
>> 
>> 
>> Thank you
>> 
>> 
>> James Crawford
>> Phaser Fire Protection Ltd.
>> Phone  604-888-0318
>> Fax 604-888-4732
>> Cel 604-790-0938
>> Email  [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>> Web www.phaserfire.ca<http://www.phaserfire.ca>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to