One of the questions I’m hoping to get some insight from this discussion is 
when does an area become concealed. Doors the “enclosing” of the area conceal 
it or is it another mitigating circumstance?

Is it adjoining space until its concealed?

Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>

________________________________
From: Sprinklerforum <[email protected]> on behalf 
of Kyle.Montgomery <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 9:32 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: 'Cecil Bilbo'; 'Pete Schwab'
Subject: RE: NFPA 13 8.15.23 Spaces above ceilings 2016ed

It’s kind of a gray area, but I’m going to politely disagree with my friend 
Travis and say that you can apply 8.15.23.3 and extend sprinkler coverage at 
the deck only 0.6 times the design area past the room with no ceiling.

The trick is the wording. It’s written as though the space with the ceiling is 
the small space and the space without the ceiling is the large space. So, if 
you had a small room with the ceiling that was an “island” in the middle of a 
warehouse, for example, you could not apply this rule because it is open to an 
adjacent sprinklered space on all sides. That’s the opposite of what you have.

You’ve got a situation where the space above the drop ceiling isn’t open to an 
adjacent sprinklered space on only one side, it’s open to the adjacent 
sprinklered space IN THE MIDDLE. Someone could make the argument that this 
condition doesn’t match the description so you can’t apply it, and that could 
be a strong argument. But I would say that if you look at the intention of the 
rule, which is based on the fire not extending more than half the design area 
into the area above the ceiling, I can’t see a good argument that says if you 
extend your coverage the minimum distance out from your room that you haven’t 
met the intention of the rule.

Fellows, please feel free to shoot some holes in my theory.

Kyle Montgomery
 [cid:[email protected]]
Aero Automatic Sprinkler Co.
21605 N. Central Ave.
Phoenix, AZ 85024
Direct: 623.580.7820
Cell: 602.763.4736
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>



From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of JD Gamble
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 5:39 PM
To: [email protected]; 
[email protected]
Cc: 'Cecil Bilbo' <[email protected]>; 'Pete Schwab' 
<[email protected]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: NFPA 13 8.15.23 Spaces above ceilings 2016ed

Travis you are correct in your mental image of the room. We have three 
locations that have come into question. One does only have one communicating 
wall but the others have multiple. It’s my impression as well that without the 
full height walls, we have to add coverage.

Get Outlook for 
iOS<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__aka.ms_o0ukef&d=DwMF-g&c=wn3mZQLIuInh2ClcJ0_DIA&r=Z_2A85VL7AQzoqudh6uOyS3bn8etxB7nLN8OBJwQd9A&m=eghgkfsX9abLYXeIrpwuoTYvdheDNXuDJORls3qcspo&s=2BqpXVsmVXyFyZ8Zb6f0fp_85JWt2YD4y-aVWcmjmek&e=>

________________________________
From: Sprinklerforum 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
 on behalf of Travis Mack, SET, CFPS, CWBSP, RME-G 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 6:36 PM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Cc: 'Cecil Bilbo'; 'Pete Schwab'
Subject: RE: NFPA 13 8.15.23 Spaces above ceilings 2016ed

I’m not sure I get your total picture, but I’ll try.

First, we start with sprinklers in all spaces.  Then we can ask if we can omit 
in places.  The section you quote is only applicable if it is open on one side, 
like figure A.15.23.3.  If your IT room is the space in question and you have 
it open to rooms around it, then your don’t meet the criteria of open on only 
one side.  Based on very limited idea of what you have on your project, I tend 
to think sprinklers would be required above the areas adjacent to the IT room.  
But I am envisioning the IT room as an island surrounded by rooms on all sides, 
or at least more than one side.

[MFP_logo_F]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.mfpdesign.com_&d=DwMF-g&c=wn3mZQLIuInh2ClcJ0_DIA&r=Z_2A85VL7AQzoqudh6uOyS3bn8etxB7nLN8OBJwQd9A&m=eghgkfsX9abLYXeIrpwuoTYvdheDNXuDJORls3qcspo&s=Hz3noah6lgQGs0WfbQ50ySTEV5UOSJw9Co4ojCpIFOQ&e=>
Travis Mack, CFPS, CWBSP, RME-G, SET
MFP Design, LLC
3356 E Vallejo Ct
Gilbert, AZ 85298
480-505-9271
fax: 866-430-6107
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
www.mfpdesign.com<http://www.mfpdesign.com>

Send large files to us via: 
https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com_-3Furl-3Dhttps-253A-252F-252Fwww.hightail.com-252Fu-252FMFPDesign-26data-3D02-257C01-257C-257C1121d49f9e6b4cf248f108d4df580e77-257C14e5497c16da42e69ffa77d19bafe511-257C0-257C0-257C636379016677342180-26sdata-3DeGdMZGu2wXhUupGwgGTrqF3b54OP5-252BAZvlHhABSexWY-253D-26reserved-3D0&d=DwMF-g&c=wn3mZQLIuInh2ClcJ0_DIA&r=Z_2A85VL7AQzoqudh6uOyS3bn8etxB7nLN8OBJwQd9A&m=eghgkfsX9abLYXeIrpwuoTYvdheDNXuDJORls3qcspo&s=VczTFbxx_WZGN3lKUZ0kAUg1Ka3RWwcUPsrcqZDsQrQ&e=>
LinkedIn: 
https://www.linkedin.com/in/travismack<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com_-3Furl-3Dhttps-253A-252F-252Fwww.linkedin.com-252Fin-252Ftravismack-26data-3D02-257C01-257C-257C1121d49f9e6b4cf248f108d4df580e77-257C14e5497c16da42e69ffa77d19bafe511-257C0-257C0-257C636379016677342180-26sdata-3DtT5E7LsZjSmyreKi4gDCa70EWN-252BZodi-252FhbeCbHNRijI-253D-26reserved-3D0&d=DwMF-g&c=wn3mZQLIuInh2ClcJ0_DIA&r=Z_2A85VL7AQzoqudh6uOyS3bn8etxB7nLN8OBJwQd9A&m=eghgkfsX9abLYXeIrpwuoTYvdheDNXuDJORls3qcspo&s=K25YN1NWNJv8QRn6oes3yRAWP6FnzBU8khGDlED0VOk&e=>

“The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price 
is forgotten.”


From: Sprinklerforum 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
 On Behalf Of JD Gamble
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 5:31 PM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Cc: 'Cecil Bilbo' 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Pete Schwab 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: NFPA 13 8.15.23 Spaces above ceilings 2016ed

Can anyone explain how this section would NOT apply to the following situation.

IT Room, open to deck, walls do not go full height.  Rooms around the IT room 
are non/limited combustible above with hardlids below.  Currently no sprinklers 
installed above the ceilings where spaces communicate with the IT rooms open 
walls. (we are in the argument about it, State isn’t much help).

Have I applied this section in error requiring sprinklers above the hardlids 
because the walls are not full height based on 8.15.23?

JD Gamble
LSS of Sheridan Inc.


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to