Yep, it’s actually 14 sprinklers.  Bunch of small compartments.

 

 

Thank you,

 

Bob Knight, CET III

Fire by Knight, LLC

208-318-3057

 

From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Kyle.Montgomery via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 5:33 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: Kyle.Montgomery
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] RE: Floor area less than required

 

That sounds correct.

 

It seems strange that your calculation is over-discharging by more than 100% 
though. Minimum discharge is 90 GPM and you’re discharging over 200 GPM? Do you 
have like 13 sprinklers jammed into this area?

 

-Kyle M

 

From: Sprinklerforum <[email protected]> On Behalf 
Of Bob Knight via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 3:27 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Bob Knight <[email protected]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Floor area less than required

 

So, in this case I’m discharging over 200 gpm due to the number of sprinklers 
in the area.  Based on this I shouldn’t need to add any additional flow, 
correct?

 

 

Thank you,

 

Bob Knight, CET III

Fire by Knight, LLC

208-318-3057

 

From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Shawn Foor via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 4:23 PM
To: [email protected]; sprinklerforum
Cc: Shawn Foor
Subject: Re: Floor area less than required

 

That is the way I read it as well. You would have to add the additional 6 GPM.

 

On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 5:03 PM Bob Knight via Sprinklerforum 
<[email protected]> wrote:

NFPA 13, 2016 ed. States:

23.4.4.2.5   Where the total design discharge from these oper-

ating sprinklers is less than the minimum required discharge

determined by multiplying the required design density times

the required minimum design area, an additional flow shall be

added at the point of connection of the branch line to the

cross main furthest from the source to increase the overall

demand, not including hose stream allowance, to the mini-

mum required discharge.

 

This is kinda gray to me.  Does it mean that if I have a light hazard area that 
is only 884 sf (offices in a shop)

and the area modifier being applied will allow for a 900 sf area, then I would 
need a minimum discharge of 90 gpm over the entire area?

Then, if my calculations bare out 92 gpm nothing else needs done, but if they 
came out to 84 gpm an additional flow of 6 gpm would need to be added?

 

Sorry about the run on sentences, just confused.

 

 

Thank you,

 

Bob Knight, CET III

Fire by Knight, LLC

208-318-3057

FBK-LOGO-EMAIL

 

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org 
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.firesprinkler.org_listinfo.cgi_sprinklerforum-2Dfiresprinkler.org&d=DwMFaQ&c=wn3mZQLIuInh2ClcJ0_DIA&r=Z_2A85VL7AQzoqudh6uOyS3bn8etxB7nLN8OBJwQd9A&m=_2ppVlQRx7Fb57SSZ9NkK5o7rXDrqJ5TJ7l_rnRCOms&s=ehlEtH7Yni3MIGcXuqxP2PJVlM6NhOL93jbj5WooRyk&e=>
 




 

-- 

Shawn Foor, SET

 

FOOR DESIGN, LLC

10208 E 98TH ST

TULSA, OK 74133

P:918-237-1400

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
  • Floor area less th... Bob Knight via Sprinklerforum
    • Re: Floor are... Shawn Foor via Sprinklerforum
      • RE: Floor... Bob Knight via Sprinklerforum
        • RE: [... Kyle.Montgomery via Sprinklerforum
          • R... Bob Knight via Sprinklerforum
            • ... Travis Mack, SET, CFPS, CWBSP, RME-G via Sprinklerforum
              • ... Bob Knight via Sprinklerforum
                • ... Fpdcdesign via Sprinklerforum
                • ... Travis Mack, SET, CFPS, CWBSP, RME-G via Sprinklerforum
                • ... Bob Knight via Sprinklerforum
                • ... Jussef Liban - GRUPO 3S via Sprinklerforum
                • ... Dennis Wilson via Sprinklerforum
                • ... Hinson, Ryan via Sprinklerforum
                • ... Ron Greenman via Sprinklerforum
                • ... Rod DiBona via Sprinklerforum

Reply via email to