Yes, but...  NFPA #24 (Underground Fire Mains), within the scope paragraph, 
excludes 13R and 13D systems. 

Andrew Steele

-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum <sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org> On Behalf 
Of Matt Grise via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Thursday, March 3, 2022 10:24 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Cc: Matt Grise <m...@afpsprink.com>
Subject: RE: 13D UG flush 

Is there not some underground code that requires a flush? Either NFPA 24 if it 
only supplies the sprinklers, or IPC if it is a domestic plumbing line.

We have encountered many contractors who swear they have never heard of 
flushing - but that has never been a good excuse to not do it.

Matt


-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum <sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org> On Behalf 
Of Rocci 3 Cetani via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2022 9:12 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Cc: Rocci 3 Cetani <roc...@norcalfire.com>
Subject: 13D UG flush

We have a contractor that is refusing to flush the UG pipe prior to tie in 
because he "has never done it in 20 years". I can find something in NFPA 13R 
that requires a flush  but nothing in 13D...... Anyone have any insight on why 
its not required in 13D?

Rocci Cetani III, CET
Senior Designer
Water-Based Fire Protections Systems Layout, Nicet Level III

Northern California Fire Protection Services Inc.
16840 Joleen Way Bldg. A
Morgan Hill, CA 95037
P-(408) 776-1580 EXT.1010
F-(408) 776-1590


roc...@norcalfire.com<mailto:roc...@norcalfire.com>
https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwww.norcalfire.com&c=E,1,8NwqTuO1pZIUJpx2KvyFgvVTGHQFvqYTLTAahq17GJqL3uEklm1X6d_Fyg87o70pdjfnU7tAA5qee-b2S-Vl_QpNfrmTGTix7CuvngcLGyk,&typo=1<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww.norcalfire.com%2f&c=E,1,WA4KQPq3q4H98xiknI0_tMz4Jvv6fbqYzw_YxRsT_k2Ff_GQnLPMzpppsj_-9eYXRj1asDy7V0gFTH9TDW97OkknH_ZJtk87c0LcNbuw&typo=1>

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message and any document accompanying it may 
contain confidential information belonging to the sender. The information is 
intended only for the use of individual or entity named above. If you are not 
the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver this 
message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
copying or taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information 
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please 
immediately notify us by telephone to arrange for return of the documents.

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2flists.firesprinkler.org%2flistinfo.cgi%2fsprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org&c=E,1,VymNo7T1uc13SNYyPyMKpvQEqMlqhWVz8hRj7FaSUYJ03TX8SVsEFBjTFuzalh82IUPKhrKcoqgosoPkSiW6mYUvPhOm63I88J47KADBDxIhfuMFhH_yrayA&typo=1
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of our organization. Do not click 
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content 
is safe.
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
  • 13D UG f... Rocci 3 Cetani via Sprinklerforum
    • RE:... Matt Grise via Sprinklerforum
      • ... Steele, Andrew via Sprinklerforum
        • ... Jones, William - Fire Plans Examiner/Inspector via Sprinklerforum
    • Re:... J H via Sprinklerforum
    • RE:... Prahl, Craig/GVL via Sprinklerforum
      • ... Ken Wagoner via Sprinklerforum

Reply via email to