Eric - NFPA 13 is open for public comment, submit your proposal!

On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 10:09 AM Eric Rieve <[email protected]> wrote:

> As always it comes down to specific situations and judgement.  From an ITM
> standpoint tie-in drains are incredibly valuable as they significantly
> reduce the likelihood of one drain out of many getting missed and causing a
> system break. Take a theoretical open warehouse dry system where the riser
> and cross main happen to be on the high side of a shed roof, and you have
> 20 branch-lines all pitched down to the low eave (don’t laugh, I’ve seen it
> before). Tying them all together into a single low-point might cause water
> delivery times to skew, but if you instead divided them into four or five
> drain clusters then you will have significantly improved the
> maintainability of the system while minimizing the “gridding” effect.
>
>
>
> The commentary can also be misleading if you only skim the first paragraph
> and don’t take time to digest the whole context. The commentary leads with
> a comment about how the *drain* should be *at least* 1” in size. This
> could easily be misinterpreted as meaning that the tie-in piping should be
> at least 1” in size since that is what this code section is about. This
> reading would suggest a benefit in increasing the piping to a larger size
> which would be in direct conflict with the code section.
>
>
>
> It’s not till the very last sentence that the commentary reiterates why 1”
> is the max size permitted. The commentary it trying to provide some helpful
> context about the hydraulic effects of tie-in drains, but the structure
> does make it seem like the author is saying the code section shouldn’t be
> followed.
>
>
>
> Here is my humble attempt to improve the clarity of the commentary. Based
> on my personal opinion of the intent obviously.
>
> “When two or more adjacent branch lines are trapped in a dry pipe or
> preaction system, the ends of the branch lines must be piped together 
> utilizing
> 1” pipe and run to a single low point drain. at least 1 in. (25 mm) in
> size, as stated in *16.10.5.3.5*
> <https://link.nfpa.org/publications/13/2022/chapters/16#ID000130002180>.
> The drain section after the tie-in piping should be sized per the
> requirements of 16.10.5.3.5 needs to be equipped with a valve and a
> nipple and cap or a valve with a plug to facilitate moisture removal from
> the system.
>
> Properly pitching tie-in drains and removing condensate from drains prior
> to freezing weather are extremely important measures. Typically, tie-in
> drains consist of smaller-size piping connected to a rather large volume of
> piping, and, with these smaller drains, freeze-ups are possible.
>
> Care should be taken when determining how many branch lines are tied
> together to a single drain, Tie-in drains on multiple adjacent branch
> lines should be avoided, if possible, because the use of tie-in drains,
> in effect, creates a gridded system. Gridded dry pipe systems and gridded
> double interlock preaction systems are prohibited by *8.3.2.7*
> <https://link.nfpa.org/publications/13/2022/chapters/8#ID000130000804>.
> In these types of systems, all the air in the piping must be evacuated
> before a steady flow of water is discharged from the operated sprinklers. A
> gridded pipe arrangement is likely to result in excessive time delays
> before effective sprinkler discharge occurs. Tie-in drains are considered
> necessary to allow rapid drainage of systems protecting cold environments.
>  While The restriction that tie-in drains be limited to 1 in. (25 mm)
> should help minimize delays, dividing the branch lines into smaller
> groups each with an individual drain manifold may be necessary when a
> significant number of adjacent branch lines are present.”
>
>
>
>
>
> Hope this helps!
>
> Eric Rieve
>
> Rieve Fire Protection
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Monday, March 13, 2023 7:53 PM
> *To:* 'Discussion list on issues relating to automatic fire sprinklers' <
> [email protected]>
> *Subject:* [Sprinklerforum] Re: Combining dry system drains
>
>
>
> Now that is interesting…
>
>
>
> The wording of the code is that tie-in drains are required, but the
> commentary says they should be avoided if possible.
>
>
>
> The 2022 edition (16.10.5.3.6) has the same wording in both the code and
> the commentary.
>
>
>
>
>
> David L. Miller, P.E.
>
> *Engineered Fire Protection, **LLC*
>
> 11920 Richcroft Avenue
>
> Baton Rouge, Louisiana  70814
>
> 225-273-5040
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Monday, March 13, 2023 6:41 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [Sprinklerforum] Re: Combining dry system drains
>
>
>
> 2016 edition NFPA 13 8.16.2.5.3.6 ….. commentary from handbook…..Tie-in
> drains on multiple adjacent branch lines should be avoided, if possible,
> because the use of tie-in drains, in effect, creates a gridded system
>
>
>
>
>
> *Jeff Normand*
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Monday, March 13, 2023 6:37 PM
> *To:* 'Discussion list on issues relating to automatic fire sprinklers' <
> [email protected]>
> *Subject:* [Sprinklerforum] Re: Combining dry system drains
>
>
>
> NFPA 13 (2016 edition) 8.16.2.5.3.6 Tie-in drains shall be provided for
> multiple adjacent trapped branch pipes and shall be only 1 in. (25 mm).
> Tie-in drain lines shall be pitched a minimum of 1⁄2 in. per 10 ft (4 mm/m).
>
>
>
> David L. Miller, P.E.
> Engineered Fire Protection, LLC
> 11920 Richcroft Avenue
> Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70814
> 225-273-5040
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean Lockyer <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, March 13, 2023 6:31 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Sprinklerforum] Combining dry system drains
>
> Can dry system drains (I.E. - Drum drips) be combined or interconnected ?
>
> Sean Lockyer
> Project Designer
> AITLifeSafety
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> SprinklerForum mailing list:
> https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> [email protected]
>
> _________________________________________________________
> SprinklerForum mailing list:
> https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> [email protected]
>
> _________________________________________________________
> SprinklerForum mailing list:
> https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> [email protected]

-- 
Kevin Hall, M.Eng., P.E., ET, CWBSP, PMSFPE
Sr. Manager, Engineering and Technical Services
American Fire Sprinkler Association
_________________________________________________________
SprinklerForum mailing list:
https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to