On 11/3/17, Robert M. Münch <robert.mue...@saphirion.com> wrote: > On 2 Nov 2017, at 16:56, Richard Hipp wrote: > >> Did you see this document: https://www.sqlite.org/undoredo.html > > No, I didn't, thanks a lot. > > >> Do the ideas talked about there help in any way? > > Yes, it's what we are seeking. > > The SESSIONs (sorry thought it's named VERSION) extension looks like > something that will handle the tracking tables for us and create those > change-sets as in the example. Storing change-sets inside the DB should work > too, I think. > > Or would it be better to use the approach from the example and omit the > SESSIONs extension at all?
Either way will probably work. Which approach seems easiest for you to implement? -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
