In my last mail i have multiple table creation and index. It seam that the
overtime is for all the create statement.

It really looks like a disk pb. But can't identify so much difference in my
direct disk access ( with DD )

I will try it on an other host.

2017-11-30 14:59 GMT+01:00 Simon Slavin <slav...@bigfraud.org>:

> OP wrote:
>
> > CREATE TABLE f (fid VARCHAR, path VARCHAR, meta VARCHAR, mtime INTEGER,
> > virtual INTEGER, pfid VARCHAR, type VARCHAR, ts INTEGER);
>
> Is this the first content of a new file ?  If so, SQLite has to create the
> file and write some structure information as well as writing the table.  I
> suspect that the time taken for the overhead is far more than the time
> taken for the CREATE command.
>
> Could you try changing f.sql to create ten tables ?  For example create
> the table "f1 as above then create tables "f2" to "f1" with the same
> columns ?  It would be interesting to see what this does to both timings.
>
> Simon.
>
> _______________________________________________
> sqlite-users mailing list
> sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
> http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
>



-- 
*Sébastien HEITZMANN*
Gérant & Directeur technique
+33 (0)3 89 333 889
Plus d'info sur : www.2le.net


<http://www.facebook.com/pages/2le-Logiciel-libre-pour-lentreprise/194148499368?ref=ts>
  <http://twitter.com/2le_net#>
<http://www.viadeo.com/profile/00225bbq5gc1ukcu>
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to