I'd stick with "serverless". The marketing teams that make "serverless" mean that websites don't run with "servers" are I-D-TEN-Ts. It's a fad phrase that'll go away eventually. I understand marketing, and its purpose, but, in this case, they're pushing it.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 9:31 PM sub sk79 <subs...@gmail.com> wrote: > Also maybe Slipstreamed? > > -Neal > > On Monday, January 27, 2020, sub sk79 <subs...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > How about Seamless, Integrated or Baked-in? > > > > -Neal > > > > On Monday, January 27, 2020, Warren Young <war...@etr-usa.com> wrote: > > > >> On Jan 27, 2020, at 3:18 PM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > >> > > >> > "serverless" has become a popular buzz-word that > >> > means "managed by my hosting provider rather than by me.” > >> > >> “Serverless” it a screwy buzzword anyway, because of course there’s > still > >> a server under its new meaning. > >> > >> My vote? Keep using the term. We were here first. > >> > >> This is an ancient problem. It is why is any serious dictionary the > >> count of definitions considerably exceeds the count of headwords. These > >> new kids? “serverless, sense 2.” > >> _______________________________________________ > >> sqlite-users mailing list > >> sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org > >> http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
