Warren Young, on Monday, January 27, 2020 07:36 PM, wrote... > > On Jan 27, 2020, at 3:18 PM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > > > > "serverless" has become a popular buzz-word that > > means "managed by my hosting provider rather than by me.” > > “Serverless” it a screwy buzzword anyway, because of course there’s > still a server under its new meaning. > > My vote? Keep using the term. We were here first.
I agree. It's an SQL engine without a server need, so it's SQL serverless. Or "server needn't". or Server? No. SQL? Yes Easy? Yes Fast? Yes Multi-platform? Yes Choose any five. > This is an ancient problem. It is why is any serious dictionary the count > of definitions considerably exceeds the count of headwords. These new kids? > “serverless, sense 2.”\ I actually don't believe is ancient. My believe is that this probably started back in late 80's or early 90's with all of these words revision and forcing the meaning. Let's agree to disagree idealogy. josé _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
