Greetings Neville-

(thanks for changing the subject. :)

I'm only a few pages into the book. Before I went deeper, I just wanted to
get a handle on the [...] notations.

The first few pages are quite informative. Let me get deeper into the book
and I'll be glad to share my thoughts on it here.

Best regards,
Rick
 
 

#>-----Original Message-----
#>From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org 
#>[mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Neville Franks
#>Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2009 9:11 PM
#>To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
#>Subject: Re: [sqlite] The SQL Guide to SQLite
#>
#>Rick,
#>Changing the conversation a little I would be interested to 
#>know your opinion of this book, as I'm sure would others. 
#>Many were disappointed with "The Definitive Guide to SQLite".
#>
#>
#>Sunday, July 19, 2009, 11:56:05 AM, you wrote:
#>
#>RR> Okay. We're talking two different things here.
#>
#>RR> One states "academic papers" and you state "technical documents".
#>
#>RR> This is a "book", not an "academic paper or technical document".
#>
#>RR> I'm all for Names and Dates. I'm quite familiar with 
#>(Williams and 
#>RR> Jones
#>RR> 1981) and other such references. They appear in most of 
#>the books I possess.
#>
#>RR> However, bracketed references such as [SMI01] do not. 
#>First time in 
#>RR> my 50 years I've come across this.
#>
#>RR> Are we assuming that everyone who buys this book attended 
#>University?
#>
#>RR> Another thing I'm familiar with are TAGS in documents. 
#>These looked 
#>RR> like TAGS to me. I immediately assumed the TAGS weren't replaced 
#>RR> with the actual material.
#>
#>RR> Anyway, I think enough has been said on this. One should never 
#>RR> ASSUME that a convention is understood by ALL readers. 
#>Apparently, it is not.
#>
#>RR> Best regards,
#>
#>RR> Rich
#>
#>
#>RR>  
#>
#>#>>-----Original Message-----
#>#>>From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org 
#>#>>[mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Rich Shepard
#>#>>Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2009 8:00 PM
#>#>>To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
#>#>>Subject: Re: [sqlite] The SQL Guide to SQLite #>> #>>On 
#>Sat, 18 Jul 2009, Rick Ratchford wrote:
#>#>>
#>#>>> All I know is that this is a book. I have a vast library 
#>of #>>technical #>>> books and this is the ONLY one that uses 
#>this convention. 
#>#>>Even my copy
#>#>>> of "A New Kind of Science" by Wolfram doesn't use this 
#>#>>convention. :-b #>>
#>#>>   There are many conventions for citations in books, 
#>#>>reports, articles, and other documents that cite original 
#>#>>sources. When I was in academia, the ecological literature 
#>#>>(books, papers, etc.) used a (name date) format; e.g., 
#>(Smith #>>1962), or (Williams and Jones 1981), or (Foobar et 
#>al. 1954). 
#>#>>The bibliography or reference section (and there is a 
#>#>>difference between those
#>#>>two) was arranged in alphabetic order. Many other 
#>technical #>>books (including
#>#>>mine) use a numeric citation, e.g., [20], and the 
#>#>>bibliography is numeric rather than alphabetic. Still 
#>other #>>technical documents use the author abreviation plus 
#>two-digit #>>year system which is what you apparently 
#>encountered; e.g., #>>[ORA92] or [SMI01]. They are all common.
#>#>>
#>#>>   Personally, I like the author/year system because it's 
#>#>>explicit and easy to comprehend without requiring looking 
#>at #>>the references section.
#>#>>Regardless, it's up to the publisher, country, or the 
#>#>>practice of a particular discipline which one is used.
#>#>>
#>#>>   It's unfortunate that you had such difficulty figuring out 
#>#>>the citation system.
#>#>>
#>#>>Rich
#>#>>
#>#>>-- 
#>#>>Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D.               |  Integrity          
#>#>>  Credibility
#>#>>Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc.        |            Innovation
#>#>><http://www.appl-ecosys.com>     Voice: 503-667-4517      
#>#>>Fax: 503-667-8863
#>#>>_______________________________________________
#>#>>sqlite-users mailing list
#>#>>sqlite-users@sqlite.org
#>#>>http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
#>#>>
#>#>>
#>
#>
#>RR> _______________________________________________
#>RR> sqlite-users mailing list
#>RR> sqlite-users@sqlite.org
#>RR> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
#>
#>
#>
#>--
#>Best regards,
#>  Neville Franks, http://www.surfulater.com http://blog.surfulater.com
#> 
#>
#>_______________________________________________
#>sqlite-users mailing list
#>sqlite-users@sqlite.org
#>http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
#>
#>


_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to