On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Pavel Ivanov <paiva...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I don't think so. Just like the older SQLite journal system, it's important >> that the WAL files survive through a crash. > > I believe WAL file is not a problem here (despite some confusing macro > name that Matthew proposed). The problem is SHM file which don't have > to survive - SQLite rebuilds it in case if it's missing. >
Right, sorry for the confusing terminology. The "-shm" file is what I was referring to, since that's the part that needs to be writable even for a read-only app, if I understand correctly. I believe that it's okay to put that in a ramdisk, issues with chroot() aside. -- Matthew L. Creech _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
