On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Pavel Ivanov <paiva...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't think so.  Just like the older SQLite journal system, it's important 
>> that the WAL files survive through a crash.
> I believe WAL file is not a problem here (despite some confusing macro
> name that Matthew proposed). The problem is SHM file which don't have
> to survive - SQLite rebuilds it in case if it's missing.

Right, sorry for the confusing terminology.  The "-shm" file is what I
was referring to, since that's the part that needs to be writable even
for a read-only app, if I understand correctly.  I believe that it's
okay to put that in a ramdisk, issues with chroot() aside.

Matthew L. Creech
sqlite-users mailing list

Reply via email to