Hi Tom, "Supports SQLite extension" would be an accurate feature description. And in the cell (value) I suggest to put - if supported - FTS2, FTS3, RTree etc., otherwise a "-". A yes or no is insufficient because some support RTree but not FTS and vice versa. Alternatively you may have a row for each type of extension but I find this a bit too much.
Hartwig Am 20.02.2011 um 21:48 schrieb BareFeetWare: > On 21/02/2011, at 3:20 AM, skywind mailing lists wrote: > >> in your comparison chart it would also be nice to see which software is able >> to support SQLite extension. A couple of them do not support the FTS nor >> RTree capabilities of SQLite. > > Sure, I'd be happy to add that. How do you suggest that the feature is worded > in the table? Is "Supports SQLite extension" accurate? Please let me know > what value (eg yes or no) I should show for this feature for any apps you > know so I can add those entries. > > Thanks, > Tom > BareFeetWare > > -- > Comparison of SQLite GUI tools: > http://www.barefeetware.com/sqlite/compare/?ml > > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
