Hi Marco, Oops. My bad. Building for Archive (Release version) has a size of 3.6 MB.
-- Tito On May 16, 2011, at 8:06 AM, Marco Bambini wrote: > 4.3 MB seems really too big... you are probably building a debug version of > the library. > > -- > Marco Bambini > http://www.sqlabs.com > > > > > > > On May 16, 2011, at 5:01 PM, Tito Ciuro wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I have a question about SQLite running on iOS. If I'm not mistaken, SQLite >> on iOS is not compiled with R*Tree and FTS3. Compiling a static library of >> SQLite's amalgamated version weighs at about 4.3 MB, which represents almost >> 25% of the 20 MB-per-app allowed on the App Store. For many, this is a major >> setback because many apps can easily reach this limit. >> >> My question is: since a "light" version of SQLite is already included in >> iOS, would it be too complicated to build a static library with only R*Tree >> and FTS3 support? The idea being of course that the app would link against >> iOS' SQLite and the app's R*Tree/FTS3 library, thus reducing the app's >> footprint considerably. >> >> Are there dependencies that would make this attempt a nightmare? Has anyone >> gone through this? >> >> Thanks in advance, >> >> -- Tito >> _______________________________________________ >> sqlite-users mailing list >> sqlite-users@sqlite.org >> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
