On 2015-03-02 6:08 PM, Mike Owens wrote: > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Darren Duncan <darren at darrenduncan.net> > wrote: >> As near as I can tell, the Reply-To header from this list only contains >> sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org and does not also contain >> sqlite-users at sqlite.org so therefore I don't see the problem you're >> stating. But if it sometimes does so, then the list manager needs to ensure >> that sqlite-users at sqlite.org is never in the Reply-To header of messages >> from the list. -- Darren Duncan > > It is. As mentioned above, the explicit reply-to header is empty. I think > some people's MUA's are doing this. I just answered an off-list email from > somebody and the reply to was set to the sqlite-users at sqlite.org email, > which makes me think it is the MUA and not Mailman.
A benefit of my proposal is, if implemented, the instances of other people's explicit reply-to headers to sqlite-users at sqlite.org will disappear very quickly, as the messages they are replying to will be ones propagated through the list after the change rather than before. -- Darren Duncan
