On 2015-03-02 6:14 PM, Mike Owens wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 5:27 PM, R.Smith <rsmith at rsweb.co.za> wrote:
>> Ah, thank you, all makes sense now. If you change the first option to YES
>> then nobody else's quirky reply-to headers will get into the list, and the
>> second option remains as is (it should be setting the standard
>> @mailinglists reply-to field) - this should solve the duplication issue,
>> but if it is disagreeable to anyone, more consideration is needed.
>
> I almost don't want to even speak of this for fear that this issue will
> raise it's ugly head again. Per the Mailmain documentation (
> http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-admin/node11.html):
>
> Beware! Reply-To: munging is considered a religious issue and the policies
>> you set here can ignite some of the most heated off-topic flame wars on
>> your mailing lists. We'll try to stay as agnostic as possible, but our
>> biases may still peak through.
>>
>
> That's as much as I'll say about that.

Well it doesn't have to be complete munging, rather just enough munging to 
remove references to the old mailing list name. -- Darren Duncan

Reply via email to