On 2015-03-02 6:14 PM, Mike Owens wrote: > On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 5:27 PM, R.Smith <rsmith at rsweb.co.za> wrote: >> Ah, thank you, all makes sense now. If you change the first option to YES >> then nobody else's quirky reply-to headers will get into the list, and the >> second option remains as is (it should be setting the standard >> @mailinglists reply-to field) - this should solve the duplication issue, >> but if it is disagreeable to anyone, more consideration is needed. > > I almost don't want to even speak of this for fear that this issue will > raise it's ugly head again. Per the Mailmain documentation ( > http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-admin/node11.html): > > Beware! Reply-To: munging is considered a religious issue and the policies >> you set here can ignite some of the most heated off-topic flame wars on >> your mailing lists. We'll try to stay as agnostic as possible, but our >> biases may still peak through. >> > > That's as much as I'll say about that.
Well it doesn't have to be complete munging, rather just enough munging to remove references to the old mailing list name. -- Darren Duncan
