Oh okay. I see. I'll look into it. On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Darren Duncan <darren at darrenduncan.net> wrote:
> So in that case, still have the SQLite mail server reject messages to the > old list rather than forwarding them, and let the problematic MUAs deal > with it. The key thing is that by not forwarding but rejecting, the mail > server isn't sending out 2 copies of messages directly, and the rejecting > is reminding people to pay attention until the issue as a consequence goes > away. Thus any explicit Reply-To headers can be left unmunged by the list > server. -- Darren Duncan > > > On 2015-03-02 7:10 PM, Mike Owens wrote: > >> The problem is that this is the very bone of contention in the reply-to >> religious war. Is it not? I may be wrong, but I thought this is the very >> setting that people get so defensive about changing. As we have it now, >> people have a suitable default pointing back to the (correct) list but >> also >> the freedom to change the reply-to header should they want to. If we strip >> the reply-to header in order to correct for the problematic MUA's, then >> the >> latter freedom is lost. And if I remember correctly, some people get very >> angry about this. >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Darren Duncan <darren at darrenduncan.net> >> wrote: >> >> On 2015-03-02 6:14 PM, Mike Owens wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 5:27 PM, R.Smith <rsmith at rsweb.co.za> wrote: >>>> >>>> Ah, thank you, all makes sense now. If you change the first option to >>>>> YES >>>>> then nobody else's quirky reply-to headers will get into the list, and >>>>> the >>>>> second option remains as is (it should be setting the standard >>>>> @mailinglists reply-to field) - this should solve the duplication >>>>> issue, >>>>> but if it is disagreeable to anyone, more consideration is needed. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I almost don't want to even speak of this for fear that this issue will >>>> raise it's ugly head again. Per the Mailmain documentation ( >>>> http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-admin/node11.html): >>>> >>>> Beware! Reply-To: munging is considered a religious issue and the >>>> policies >>>> >>>> you set here can ignite some of the most heated off-topic flame wars on >>>>> your mailing lists. We'll try to stay as agnostic as possible, but our >>>>> biases may still peak through. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> That's as much as I'll say about that. >>>> >>>> >>> Well it doesn't have to be complete munging, rather just enough munging >>> to >>> remove references to the old mailing list name. -- Darren Duncan >>> >> > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > -- Mike
