On 10/7/15, Jaroslaw Staniek <staniek at kde.org> wrote: > ? would you elaborate what? is the > benefit of using x.y.z versioning scheme if so many new features come to > the "z" release?
That's the versioning scheme that has been used by SQLite for 15 years. Back when it was adopted, 15 years ago, it was certainly *not* the case that 99.9% of software did something different. In fact, 15 years ago, the current SQLite versioning scheme was rather common. The community seems to want the second number (current 8) to increment every time a new feature is added to SQLite. I will take your request under advisement. Realize, however, that had the current preferred number scheme been used for SQLite from the beginning, the next release would be called 3.112. -- D. Richard Hipp drh at sqlite.org
