I've not heard of fossil so this thread piqued my interest; I currently use Mercurial where I have a choice. I don't seem to be able to find much about Fossil v's Mercurial. This blog post looked interesting though: http://www.omiyagames.com/farewell-fossil-version-control/
Despite Mercurial being less ... opaque than Git, I guess many of the points remain the same for that comparison. ---- On Wed, 18 May 2016 16:55:15 +0100 Warren Young<wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote ---- On May 18, 2016, at 4:43 AM, Kees Nuyt <k.nuyt at zonnet.nl> wrote: > > On Wed, 18 May 2016 11:39:28 +0200, Cecil Westerhof > <cldwesterhof at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I would be interested what you find wrong about Git and is better in your >> version control system. > > Check the archives of the fossil-users mailing list Links to a few of the wider-ranging Git vs Fossil threads in recent years: https://goo.gl/rVzYTx https://goo.gl/8xKoZy https://goo.gl/RPJLEq https://goo.gl/Gq3Cga One of those threads didn?t start out as ?Fossil vs Git,? but ended up there eventually. It?s nearly inevitable when someone brings up Git on the Fossil mailing list. :) _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
