Interesting read, thanks! I?m new to fossil, but personally I have fallen in love with it over the past month or so I?ve been using it.
My reaction to git after several years of dabbling with it here or there has been 180 degrees opposite?not love git is a menace On May 18, 2016, at 11:04 AM, Jonathan Moules <jonathan-lists at lightpear.com> wrote: > I've not heard of fossil so this thread piqued my interest; I currently use > Mercurial where I have a choice. > I don't seem to be able to find much about Fossil v's Mercurial. This blog > post looked interesting though: > http://www.omiyagames.com/farewell-fossil-version-control/ > > Despite Mercurial being less ... opaque than Git, I guess many of the points > remain the same for that comparison. > > > ---- On Wed, 18 May 2016 16:55:15 +0100 Warren Young<wyml at > etr-usa.com> wrote ---- > > On May 18, 2016, at 4:43 AM, Kees Nuyt <k.nuyt at zonnet.nl> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 18 May 2016 11:39:28 +0200, Cecil Westerhof > > <cldwesterhof at gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> I would be interested what you find wrong about Git and is better in > your > >> version control system. > > > > Check the archives of the fossil-users mailing list > > Links to a few of the wider-ranging Git vs Fossil threads in recent years: > > https://goo.gl/rVzYTx > https://goo.gl/8xKoZy > https://goo.gl/RPJLEq > https://goo.gl/Gq3Cga > > One of those threads didn?t start out as ?Fossil vs Git,? but ended up there > eventually. It?s nearly inevitable when someone brings up Git on the Fossil > mailing list. :) > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
