Roger. Since I don't deal with pre-release versions much I guess my brain automatically skipped over the timestamp and other number, as it's used to the (3.15.0) part being unique on its own. (Which it obviously can't be while in development)
<Attempts to wake up brain> Don't mind me folks, nothing to see here, nothing to see here... -----Original Message----- From: sqlite-users [mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@mailinglists.sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Richard Hipp Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2016 10:47 AM To: SQLite mailing list Subject: Re: [sqlite] schema_version and Vacuum or Backup API On 9/8/16, David Raymond <david.raym...@tomtom.com> wrote: > Random question from when I just loaded up that URL: Is it supposed to have > a futuristic SQLite version? > > SQLite Version: 2016-08-22 20:10:01 [7839519349] (3.15.0) Yes. That's called "dogfooding" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eating_your_own_dog_food) and we do it extensively. Both the SQLite and the Fossil projects routinely use unreleased trunk versions of the software for internal mission-critical processes. I'm typing this reply inside a Firefox nightly that is recompiled with the latest trunk version of SQLite (or nearly the latest - I think I rebuilt it yesterday). -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
