Peter Butler wrote: > Hi Ilias > > I don't profess to speak for the developers of SQLObject but I like the > project and find it extremely useful. Oleg does a fantastic job of > maintaining the project and responds to intelligent queries and bug > reports quickly.
ok, very nice. Possibly he can setup a google-group, thus the mailing-list becomes cleaner. >>>> SQLObject2 is even more inactive: >>>> >>> then get the code and start working on it. >>> >> why? >> > This is the idea behind open-source software. If you see a lack in some > area then you are welcome to contribute code and documentation. But the project resources are non-operative. >> No need, I'll choose another product, where contribution makes sense. >> > You are most welcome to choose another product. I hope they appreciate > your contribution as much as we have. >> SQLObject does not support schema evolution (the underlying databases do). >> >> There's really no need to twist the facts. >> As suggested, the project lead should shutdown this project (or at least >> place a visible remark on the website), thus other people to not loose >> time in evaluating an non-maintained solution. > You have made your points perfectly clear, and there is no need to > reiterate them in separate messages. If you are not happy with the > solution provided by SQLObject then please do find another project to > get involved with. I am not yet ready to leave, as I really like the simplicity behing SQLObject. . -- http://lazaridis.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ sqlobject-discuss mailing list sqlobject-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlobject-discuss
