On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 03:41:59PM +0000, Luke Opperman wrote:
> Not RowCreateSignal (called before insert, allowing modification of kwargs)
> but
> RowCreatedSignal (called after insert).
>
> It is currently defined as (kwargs, post_funcs), but never calls post_funcs
> and
> would make a lot more sense to send the newly created instance. The docs
> suggest
> there may also be a connection argument, which combined with the 'class' and
> 'id' keys in kwargs would allow you to retrieve the newly created instance,
> but
> in fact connection is never passed.
>
> If there are no objections, I would vote that it be redefined to match
> RowUpdateSignal in taking (inst, kwargs).
No objections from me.
Oleg.
--
Oleg Broytmann http://phd.pp.ru/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
sqlobject-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlobject-discuss
