> On 2011-12-02 04:40:12, Tom White wrote:
> > ./COMPILING.txt, line 280
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/2983/diff/2/?file=61445#file61445line280>
> >
> >     I think 0.20.x should continue to be the default until 0.23.x has 
> > stabilized.

I hadn't seen https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-384 which makes this 
more complex than I had thought, since Sqoop depends on features not in Hadoop 
0.20.20x. So making a dependency on 0.23.x in trunk is probably acceptable. 


- Tom


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/2983/#review3600
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 2011-12-01 18:59:33, Bilung Lee wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/2983/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2011-12-01 18:59:33)
> 
> 
> Review request for Sqoop, Arvind Prabhakar and Tom White.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Make Sqoop work with Hadoop 0.23
> 
> 
> This addresses bug SQOOP-397.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-397
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   ./COMPILING.txt 1197706 
>   ./build.xml 1208854 
>   ./ivy.xml 1208716 
>   ./ivy/libraries.properties 1208716 
>   ./src/ivy/ivy-hdp20.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   ./src/ivy/ivy-hdp23.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   ./src/ivy/libraries-hdp20.properties PRE-CREATION 
>   ./src/ivy/libraries-hdp23.properties PRE-CREATION 
>   ./src/test/com/cloudera/sqoop/TestCompression.java 1208716 
>   ./src/test/com/cloudera/sqoop/hbase/HBaseTestCase.java 1208054 
>   ./src/test/com/cloudera/sqoop/hbase/TestHBaseImport.java 1208054 
>   ./src/test/com/cloudera/sqoop/hbase/TestHBaseQueryImport.java 1208054 
>   ./src/test/com/cloudera/sqoop/mapreduce/db/TestDataDrivenDBInputFormat.java 
> 1208054 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/2983/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bilung
> 
>

Reply via email to