OK. Finally: Flexible phase adjustments are not supported (yet?). Thx for the feedback.
I think it would be nice if C-3PO would offer a simple free configurable field to be able to tailor a complete sox "effect" string. (That would also make Marco's live easier on the long run. ;) ) It'd make the plugin much more flexible. comparison to squeezelite: C-3PO uses the sox binary and not libsoxr directly. That's limiting the plugin. squeezelite, using libsoxr, can offer a broader scope of resampling options as being offered by libsoxr. Beside that, using libsoxr directly would allow to run 64bit. Obviously DSD would be an issue. sox could still be used for special purposes. Of course getting direct access to libsoxr would require to write a resampling application. That's not too difficult though. (Even I managed to write such an app ; )) When it comes to the Archimago stuff. As much as I question most of his findings on numerous topics, he IMO got a point on the resampling part. I'm not saying that I like his resampling config choice best. He IMO is pointing into the right direction though. Don't forget resampling (or any other DSP) will always be a compromise. :::' my audioblog - latest series: RaspBerry PI - \"The Audio Engine\" ' (http://soundcheck-audio.blogspot.com)::: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ soundcheck's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=34383 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105309 _______________________________________________ Squeezecenter mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/squeezecenter
