On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 12:18 +0900, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2008, Amos Jeffries wrote: > > That only because > > none has shown me a better way to do function pointers than the way squid > > currently does them. > > I'm pretty sure the async calls stuff has an implementation of this. > There's other ways - look at asio.sourceforge.net's implementation which > uses some Boost methods for creating 0, 1 and 2 argument callbacks > of varying types.
Do Boost methods for creating callbacks differ substantially from Squid methods? I was under impression they are about the same except Squid ones are less polished and simpler because they cover fewer special cases (that Squid is not using yet). Thank you, Alex.