On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 22:19 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > ons 2008-04-02 klockan 11:00 -0600 skrev Alex Rousskov: > > On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 13:04 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: > > > I only saw 2288 because it was mentioned in squid-users. Has my > > > subscribe to the bugzilla notify list gone astray again? I was getting > > > it for a few days, then nothing. > > > > Can we just subscribe squid-dev to bugzilla? > > It's squid-bugs which is the bug monitoring list..
Which is, apparently, requires more administration than the project can currently provide. It should not be that difficult for Amos or other developers to monitor bugs... > Posting address [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Administrative address N/A -- closed list > > Purpose This small list is used for reporting bugs to > Squid developers. When sending a bug report, please > follow the guidelines from the FAQ. This list is at > large replaced by our Bug Database. > > To subscribe Invitation only I may be missing something(*), but I think it would be better if squid-dev was subscribed to bugzilla OR squid-bugs allowed folks to add and remove themselves (but not post). The former will make discussing bugs easier, but will move discussion away from bug reports unless there is some glue to back-post from squid-dev to bugzilla (which has its own problems). A read-only public list may be a better alternative. Cheers, Alex. P.S. (*) I do not think we need this "invitation only" complexity to hide security-related bug reports (there should be a different mechanism for that).
