On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 23:36 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > ons 2008-04-02 klockan 15:12 -0600 skrev Alex Rousskov: > > > I may be missing something(*), but I think it would be better if > > squid-dev was subscribed to bugzilla OR squid-bugs allowed folks to add > > and remove themselves (but not post). The former will make discussing > > bugs easier, but will move discussion away from bug reports unless there > > is some glue to back-post from squid-dev to bugzilla (which has its own > > problems). A read-only public list may be a better alternative. > > squid-bugs is closed only because it's also used as contact address for > security related issues where bugzilla should not be used. > > I think the best is to set up a new address for security issues, open > squid-bugs to subscription and change squid-bugs to direct replies to > squid-dev like how squid-cvs is configured. > > I do not want to overload squid-dev with all the bugzilla chatter, but > fully agree that these should be open.
The scheme you outlined above is perfect. Alex.
