On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 14:38 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote: > > I don't think the zph patch belongs in 3.0.STABLE. It's a new feature > > with several new directives, not a bugfix, and additionally I'd like a > > bit of cleanup before release. > > > > Saw that it got merged to 3.0 some day ago... and I vote that it gets > > backed out from 3.0. But should stay in trunk. > > I added it as a simple cross-port. Seeing as it's been well tested as a > patch on 2.6. even if not integrated until recently. > > The polish was going to go in 3.1 when I have time. > > Any other votes for/against?
+/- 0 from me. -Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
