> On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 03:40 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: >> I don't think the zph patch belongs in 3.0.STABLE. It's a new feature >> with several new directives, not a bugfix, and additionally I'd like a >> bit of cleanup before release. >> >> Saw that it got merged to 3.0 some day ago... and I vote that it gets >> backed out from 3.0. But should stay in trunk. > > If the primary reason for 3.0 inclusion was that it was simple to do so, > then I think we should satisfy Henrik's request and back it out for now.
Primary reason was that it was included in 2.x, so it came under cross-porting. Still no excuse for missing the merge vote. I'll be backing out shortly. > > Since the code is already in 2.6, the patch can probably go back into > 3.0 if Henrik has time to apply the changes he wants and the code is > still not disruptive after that. > > And let's try to follow the [MERGE] rules for non-trivial changes even > though bb is not working. Yes. Apologies all around. Amos