Guido Serassio wrote:
Hi Amos,
At 13.40 25/06/2008, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Priorities are fine, but having some actual long-term directions to
fit these features into a roadmap will make much more sense.
Personally, I think you guys should consider fixing or reverting
whatever stuff is in Squid-3.HEAD right this second which causes
instability and release Squid-3.1.
:-) Oh I'd love too...
There's nothing in there right now thats inherently unstable
(excepting ESI and COSS from 3.0). Just a few bugs on the
high-priority track.
Please also add the Windows support to the list, still totally broken
and still without any usable VCS on Windows .....
Which list? the RoadMap?
I wouldn't call the windows support unstable (or destabilizing to the
rest of squid). I'd call it mostly missing already.
Amos
--
Please use Squid 2.7.STABLE3 or 3.0.STABLE7
