Hi Amos,
At 04.20 26/06/2008, Amos Jeffries wrote:
Guido Serassio wrote:
> Hi Amos,
>
> At 13.40 25/06/2008, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>>> Priorities are fine, but having some actual long-term directions to
>>> fit these features into a roadmap will make much more sense.
>>> Personally, I think you guys should consider fixing or reverting
>>> whatever stuff is in Squid-3.HEAD right this second which causes
>>> instability and release Squid-3.1.
>>
>> :-) Oh I'd love too...
>>
>> There's nothing in there right now thats inherently unstable
>> (excepting ESI and COSS from 3.0). Just a few bugs on the
>> high-priority track.
>
> Please also add the Windows support to the list, still totally broken
> and still without any usable VCS on Windows .....
Which list? the RoadMap?
Not working features list.
I wouldn't call the windows support unstable (or destabilizing to the
rest of squid). I'd call it mostly missing already.
Correct, remove Windows from Squid 3 supported platforms.
Regards
Guido
-
========================================================
Guido Serassio
Acme Consulting S.r.l. - Microsoft Certified Partner
Via Lucia Savarino, 1 10098 - Rivoli (TO) - ITALY
Tel. : +39.011.9530135 Fax. : +39.011.9781115
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.acmeconsulting.it/
