On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 14:05 +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 09:17 -0700, Alex Rousskov wrote: > > > There are two problems with this addition: > > > > 1) The directory name should not be "core". That name is treated > > specially in some environments. I have tried that directory name in > > the past and ran into problems with makefiles, archival tools, etc. I > > ended up using "base" in other projects, but there may be better > > alternatives. > > infrastructure? framework? bootstrap? guts?
"Guts" may work. Alex.
