i've  asked to be removed countless times. here's another message that
i didn't want. it's really not that hard to remove somebody is it...

This is a forwarded message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Saturday, January 31, 2004, 8:49:05 PM
Subject: Fwd: [squid-users] 802.1Q and SQUID : bug ! Don't use them together

===8<==============Original message text===============
i've  asked to be removed countless times. here's another message that
i didn't want. it's really not that hard to remove somebody is it...

This is a forwarded message
From: PINEAU Olivier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2004, 10:44:26 AM
Subject: [squid-users] 802.1Q and SQUID : bug ! Don't use them together

===8<==============Original message text===============

Instinctively, my router was on eth0.3  eth0 was just ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0
up.
So, eth0.3 was on vlan 3 port tagged.
But with this configuration, squid made me madness : paquet were routed to
client maybe 10 minutes after the request (!!!).
Problem i have solved by puting my router on eth0 on untagged port. But,
like i said before, with weird issues on several websites.

Note : with eth0 and eth0.3 configuration, pinging on several interface
works fine


Olivier


----- Original Message -----
From: "Koppen, Peter van" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 3:44 PM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] 802.1Q and SQUID : bug ! Don't use them together


> I don't have a full understanding of SQUID or of 802.1Q on Linux but what
is do know
> is regular .1Q configuration.
>
> I see that you use the real Ethernet port eth0 for VLAN 3 and use a vlan
for all the
> other VLAN definitions. What is know of VLAN's this wil NOT work. Either
you do not
> use VLAN's or you just use VLAN's So to make this work you should define a
VLAN
> (VLAN3) for you gateway and not use the non-tagged etho interface.
>
> This can be tested, the proxy itself should not be able to connect to the
pages you
> listed. nor be able to trace or ping beyond it's own interfaces.
>
> Peter
>
> On 21 Jan 2004 at 16:01, PINEAU Olivier wrote:
>
> > Hi !
> >
> > I want to inform you that i have discover a bug with 802.1Q technologie
and
> > SQUID.
> >
> > 802.1Q is for VLAN's :
> > the module 8021Q is use to configure a network card to be present on
> > different VLAN's (tagged port).
> >
> > My previous installation was :
> >
> > VLAN 3 on eth0
> > 10.0.0.0/255.254.0.0
> > routeur SDSL (gateway) 10.0.0.1
> >
> > VLAN 2 on eth0.2 (vconfig add eth0 2)
> > 10.20.0.0/255.255.0.0
> >
> > VLAN 1 on eth0.1 (vconfig add eth0 1)
> > 10.10.0.0/255.255.0.0
> >
> > With this configuration, i was ending weirds issues : i was not able to
log
> > in hotmail, yahoo!mail, e-bay, or perform any transaction on net.
> > For exemple, with hotmail, the https transaction was done and recorded
on
> > log, but the following url was not recorded in log and a basic error
message
> > prompt on navigator (DNS error or serveur not found).
> >
> > By despair, I change my network conf to use a different networdk card
for
> > each VLAN and it's finally works.
> > So, don't use 8021Q module with SQUID !
> >
> >
> > NOTE : I use 8021Q for my data serveur (SAMBA and netatalk) and it works
> > fine
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> met vriendelijke groet,
>
>
> --
> Peter van Koppen
>
> Functie : Specialist Netwerk- en systeembeheer
> Organisatie : Alfa-college
> E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> TelefoonNr : +31(0)50-597 3054
> GSM : +31(0)6-53223700
>
>

===8<===========End of original message text===========



-- 
Best regards,
 mortbox                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


===8<===========End of original message text===========



-- 
Best regards,
 mortbox                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to