SqM wrote:
I would like to second this: although I explained it was a trivial change, my manager was not impressed that I was patching stable with CVS code. It also plants seeds of doubt which leads to a loss of faith in what is undoubtedly an excellent system.Hi!
Would it not be better to create a 1.4.3a version where the reply bug is fixed so not all people have to run into the wall...
Since 1.4.3 is announced to be better and a recommended upgrade this only hurts SM if there is a known problem even if it is fixed in CVS..
Not all people installing SM knows about CVS and patching etc..
It would also cause less job for all answering mails on this
list..;-)
--
Virus scanned by edNET.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X.
From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one
installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504 -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
