>>Would it not be better to create a 1.4.3a version >>where the reply bug is fixed so not all people have >>to run into the wall...
I think I remember Jonathan saying something about it. Posting n times about it won't help. You just annoy other people. Updated squirrelmail version will be released. Please give us time. >>Since 1.4.3 is announced to be better and a recommended >>upgrade this only hurts SM if there is a known problem >>even if it is fixed in CVS.. >> >>Not all people installing SM knows about CVS and patching etc.. >> >>It would also cause less job for all answering mails on this >>list..;-) >> >> > I would like to second this: although I explained it was a trivial > change, my manager was not impressed that I was patching stable with CVS > code. It also plants seeds of doubt which leads to a loss of faith in > what is undoubtedly an excellent system. Sorry. This was a typo. Incorrectly reversed patch 5 days before release. Developers should have spotted it, but they worked on 1.5.1cvs version or haven't updated their 1.4.3cvs version, because they thought that reverse was correctly done. We are human and we make mistakes. -- Tomas ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X. >From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504 -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
