> SqM wrote: > >>Hi! >> >>Would it not be better to create a 1.4.3a version >>where the reply bug is fixed so not all people have >>to run into the wall... >> >>Since 1.4.3 is announced to be better and a recommended >>upgrade this only hurts SM if there is a known problem >>even if it is fixed in CVS.. >> >>Not all people installing SM knows about CVS and patching etc.. >> >>It would also cause less job for all answering mails on this >>list..;-) >> >> > I would like to second this: although I explained it was a trivial > change, my manager was not impressed that I was patching stable with CVS > code. It also plants seeds of doubt which leads to a loss of faith in > what is undoubtedly an excellent system.
I think the final should just be fixed, but the 1.4.3a is fine for me. I instructed my admin that 1.4.3 was final and suggested the upgrade. I then discovered the bug and he just barely got the email in time of me telling him not to upgrade yet. I then sent him the patch. However, he's going to hold off until the final version is patched. If that means it's not patched till the next final, then he'll wait till then. Shadow2531 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X. >From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504 -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
