rennykoshy left a comment (kamailio/kamailio#4603)
@miconda I am not a Kamailio expert, but have been a telco SME for ages, and
would like throw this thought out there:
Couldn't one argue that given the "switching core" nature of Kamailio, anything
that stops the processing of events is fundamentally flawed in the sense that a
carrier switching core must continue to run even if it's running in a degraded
fashion? This was indeed a test scenario in most certification testing with
extended load/failed peripherals, etc. In general, when designing & building
core fabric software, our ethos was that the client may misbehave but it
shouldn't ever cause a switch to stop processing.
To me Kamailio would seem to meet that criteria of a "core switch" since it's
the heart of so many projects.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4603#issuecomment-3960635344
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/4603/[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Kamailio - Development Mailing List -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the
sender!
