Juha Heinanen schrieb:
Klaus Darilion writes:
> I think the "reply" problem needs to be solved using the registrar NAT
> bflag. If NAT flag is set for callee, activate a reply-route with
> add_alias() (can be done per branch).
that is not correct, because add_alias() needs to be called even when
reply comes from a tcp ua that is not behind nat.
ok. depends in your NAT-traversal approach. In my pragmatic approach I
do NAT traversal anyway for all local users, thus it would work for me.
If you have a more advanced NAT traversal approach, probably you need a
second bflag which will is activated either by NAT or TCP.
regards
klaus
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
