Juha Heinanen schrieb:
Klaus Darilion writes:
> ok. depends in your NAT-traversal approach. In my pragmatic approach I
> do NAT traversal anyway for all local users, thus it would work for me.
>
> If you have a more advanced NAT traversal approach, probably you need a
> second bflag which will is activated either by NAT or TCP.
klaus,
i don't use mediaproxy if is not needed. the example implementation
already takes care of what you suggest:
but shouldn't that be extended to detect of contact of response needs to
be converted?
route [REGISTER_REQUESTS] {
...
if (isflagset(FROM_NATED) || (proto == TCP)) {
fix_nated_register();
if (isflagset(FROM_NATED)) {
setbflag("TO_NATED");
};
if (proto == TCP) {
setbflag("TO_TCP");
};
};
save("location");
and after lookup() in branch route:
if (isbflagset(TO_TCP) || isbflagset(TO_NATED)) {
t_on_reply(REWRITE_RESPONSE_CONTACT);
};
regards
klaus
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
