28 mar 2011 kl. 11.29 skrev Iñaki Baz Castillo: > 2011/3/28 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <[email protected]>: >> the proposal is to implement a signaling gateway between SIP and JINGLE to >> enable voice calls between the two networks > > Let me a question: Why SIP people is interested in interoperate with > XMPP while the opposite is not true? Inaki. Do google before stating things like this ;-)
THe XMPP people have written drafts about SIP XMPP interoperability but have gotten almost no response from the SIP crowds... http://xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-sip-xmpp-core-01.html http://xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-sip-xmpp-groupchat-01.html http://xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-sip-xmpp-media-01.html Now, check the SIP forum. How many times do they mention XMPP? /O > We have also tried to build IM/presence gateways between SIP and XMPP > (well, as SIMPLE just sucks it's arguable). > > But, have XMPP people tryed to "integrate" SIP into XMPP? not at all, > they have developed their own spec for adding voice/video over XMPP. I > don't think they are interested in SIP at all. > > As a teacher in my high school told me, protocol A cannot be > compatible with protocol B. If they are compatible, then they are the > *same* protocol. So "interoperability" between different protocols > just mean that a single protocol will remain alive. Which one? > > Just wondering. > > -- > Iñaki Baz Castillo > <[email protected]> > > _______________________________________________ > sr-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev --- * Olle E Johansson - [email protected] * Cell phone +46 70 593 68 51, Office +46 8 96 40 20, Sweden _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
