28 mar 2011 kl. 11.46 skrev Iñaki Baz Castillo: > 2011/3/28 Olle E. Johansson <[email protected]>: >>> Let me a question: Why SIP people is interested in interoperate with >>> XMPP while the opposite is not true? >> Inaki. Do google before stating things like this ;-) >> >> THe XMPP people have written drafts about SIP XMPP interoperability but have >> gotten almost no response from the SIP crowds... >> http://xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-sip-xmpp-core-01.html >> http://xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-sip-xmpp-groupchat-01.html >> http://xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-sip-xmpp-media-01.html >> >> Now, check the SIP forum. How many times do they mention XMPP? > > You are right, sorry. Anyhow, how you ever seen a XMPP server > integrating some kind of interoperability/gateway with SIP? In > Kamailio/*SER we have some attemps to interoperate with XMPP world. > Daniel and I hosted a seminar about that in Paris a few years ago, and learned a lot. It's hard to integrate them.
A very simple thing: - In SIP you can send a Subscribe with Expires:0 to "query" the server about the current state of a URI. - In XMPP, the server doesn't have a state for anything. It's just a message router. I think that's why the SIXPAC group is focusing on client-based solutions instead of trying to handle interoperability on the server side. //O _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
