On 11/13/2012 11:17 PM, Peter Dunkley wrote:
Hello,
If the call gets established at the signalling level then Kamailio is
doing all that it can do.
Media NAT traversal for WebSockets is done using ICE and is a function of
the clients - Kamailio does not have anything to do with this. I have had
problems using Boghe across NAT before - I am not sure the ICE
implementation in there works properly.
sipml5, however, will use the ICE implementation in the browser - which
should work fine.
A good test would be to see if you can make a call between two sipml5
instances in different networks. If that works then it strongly indicates
that there is a problem with the ICE implementation in Boghe/IMSDroid.
Regards,
Peter
Hello Peter,
Calls get established at the signaling level, no matter which network or
client. So I can leave Kamailio out of the equation. Also did some more
testing and can make calls between two sipml5 clients on different networks.
Regarding Boghe/IMSDroid, the devs at the company where I work are very
familiar with that framework so we'll figure that out. I'll do some
reading about ICE. No way it could be integrated like rtpproxy?
Regards,
Jeremy
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
