On 11/14/2012 11:04 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
14 nov 2012 kl. 10:55 skrev Peter Dunkley <[email protected]>:
No. The RTP/SAVPF media profile mandated by WebRTC is not supported by most
gateways or servers.
At this point in time media must go directly between clients that support this
profile.
Regards,
Peter
reading about ICE. No way it could be integrated like rtpproxy?
The idea with ICE, if you read about it, is to have a TURN server, which
eliminates the use of the RTP proxy.
ICE pushes the responsibility of NAT traversal to the client, so ICE done right
means that the client
talks with a turn server (like a RTPproxy++) and reserves support, much like
Kamailio today asks the
RTP proxy for media ports.
Hello Olle,
Got that, thanks.
The RTPproxy software could of course be made into a turn server with some code
and a lot of
energy, coming from soda drinks and cookies... :-)
If you have issues with the client handling this by itself, you can force media
relays into the ICE offer
on the server side, by manipulating the SDP. This of course only works when
there's no protection like
an electronic signature on the SDP.
If you want to learn more about ICE, please visit my presentation on slideshare:
http://www.slideshare.net/oej/sip-2012-ice-nat-traversal-for-media
Will do, thanks for the link.
Regards,
Jeremy
Cheers,
/O
------
--
* Olle E. Johansson - [email protected]
* Kamailio & SIP Masterclass Miami FL December 2012
* http://edvina.net/training/
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
