If the intent is to replace the current dialog implementation with this one or if the dialog2 is not ims specific, then we should rename-it to dialog-ng.
-ovidiu On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Olle E. Johansson <[email protected]> wrote: > > 3 jan 2013 kl. 17:49 skrev Jason Penton <[email protected]>: > > Right now it would be impossible if we want to be backwards compatible. I > suppose we could look at pre processor defines to decide which version to > use, but this could be equally as messy > > > Defines doesn't make sense. Can we rename dialog2 to ims-dialog so people > understand that it's special for IMS? > > /O _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
