3 jan 2013 kl. 21:46 skrev Ovidiu Sas <[email protected]>: > If the intent is to replace the current dialog implementation with > this one or if the dialog2 is not ims specific, then we should > rename-it to dialog-ng. > Agree. So we need to figure out where we are heading with this so we can communicate this properly to our users.
/O > -ovidiu > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Olle E. Johansson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> 3 jan 2013 kl. 17:49 skrev Jason Penton <[email protected]>: >> >> Right now it would be impossible if we want to be backwards compatible. I >> suppose we could look at pre processor defines to decide which version to >> use, but this could be equally as messy >> >> >> Defines doesn't make sense. Can we rename dialog2 to ims-dialog so people >> understand that it's special for IMS? >> >> /O > > _______________________________________________ > sr-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev _______________________________________________ sr-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
