URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/143 Title: #143: Explicitly add ordering dependency for the responders' sockets
lslebodn commented: """ On (28/02/17 04:27), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >I tested the patches both during the VM operation bringing different >responders up and during system boot. I haven't see any issues. > A tiny question. Do we need to add After to all sockets? The ideal would be that socket will trigger starting of responder and monitor will be started as a dependency of responder. I thought it is required just for nss due to some circular dependency. I would appreciate explanation. So if someone decide to remove it in future he will consider problematic use-case. LS """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/143#issuecomment-283069714
_______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
