URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/143 Title: #143: Explicitly add ordering dependency for the responders' sockets
fidencio commented: """ On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:25 PM, lslebodn <notificati...@github.com> wrote: > On (28/02/17 04:27), Jakub Hrozek wrote: > >I tested the patches both during the VM operation bringing different > responders up and during system boot. I haven't see any issues. > > > > A tiny question. > Do we need to add After to all sockets? > The ideal would be that socket will trigger starting of responder > and monitor will be started as a dependency of responder. > > I thought it is required just for nss due to some circular dependency. > > I would appreciate explanation. So if someone decide to remove it in future > he will consider problematic use-case. > Lukáš, That was a recommendation of Lukáš Nykrýn that BindsTo and After must go together. It's mentioned in the commit message. Lukáš Nykrýn also mentioned they will fix their docs about this. Best Regards, -- Fabiano Fidêncio """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/143#issuecomment-283077512
_______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org